Precision and efficiency are paramount when it comes to supply chain management. Our latest case study delves into the challenges faced by a prominent Utah-based leader in this field. With a substantial supplier database, rigorous assessments, and a dedicated service team, they were poised for success, but they aimed to enhance throughput while implementing compliance automation. Discover how they partnered with Netscribes to identify opportunities, implement strategic automation solutions, and achieve remarkable results.

Challenges

A Utah-based leader in supply chain management solutions, specializing in supplier prequalification, document management, auditing, and insurance monitoring services faced the following challenges:

  • They managed a vast database of over 125,000 registered suppliers.
  • Each supplier underwent a rigorous assessment covering health and safety, workforce compliance, ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) considerations, and financial viability.
  • Suppliers were also subject to verification for a wide range of expertise services.
  • A team of 90 service agents handled more than 20,000 service requests, including onboarding new suppliers and renewing existing ones.
  • The firm sought to increase throughput without a proportional increase in human resources and lacked automation for its compliance-based operations.

Approach and solution

To address these challenges, Netscribes devised a comprehensive approach:

  • Process analysis: Conducted a detailed time-motion analysis for each service request to understand the steps and time allocation in each process
  • Leverage identification: Identified services with the greatest potential for time-saving through automation
  • Automation implementation: Developed and deployed automation solutions for the identified compliance services

The implemented compliance automation solution consisted of the following key components:

  • Browser-based extension: Integrated with the document management system and Salesforce, streamlining the process
  • Salesforce integration: Utilized Salesforce to identify service types and details, streamlining document retrieval
  • Rule engine: Implemented a rule engine with verification rules for each service document, enabling efficient approval or rejection of service requests based on verification outcomes

Results delivered 

The implementation of this technology-enabled operation augmentation resulted in substantial benefits:

  • The client achieved a remarkable 40% boost in throughput.
  • With the same team of approximately 90 service agents, they successfully processed approximately 28,000 service requests.
  • The overall review time per service request was reduced from an average of 2 days to just 1 day.

Client benefits

By embracing technology for compliance automation, the firm not only increased its operational efficiency but also ensured faster and more accurate supplier onboarding and verification processes, ultimately enhancing its competitive edge in the market.

Discover how we can enhance efficiency without compromising quality in your business processes using compliance data automation. Contact us today to get started.

Download the Case Study

    +1
    • United States+1
    • United Kingdom+44
    • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
    • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
    • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
    • American Samoa+1684
    • Andorra+376
    • Angola+244
    • Anguilla+1264
    • Antigua and Barbuda+1268
    • Argentina+54
    • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
    • Aruba+297
    • Australia+61
    • Austria (Österreich)+43
    • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
    • Bahamas+1242
    • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
    • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
    • Barbados+1246
    • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
    • Belgium (België)+32
    • Belize+501
    • Benin (Bénin)+229
    • Bermuda+1441
    • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
    • Bolivia+591
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
    • Botswana+267
    • Brazil (Brasil)+55
    • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
    • British Virgin Islands+1284
    • Brunei+673
    • Bulgaria (България)+359
    • Burkina Faso+226
    • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
    • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
    • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
    • Canada+1
    • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
    • Caribbean Netherlands+599
    • Cayman Islands+1345
    • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
    • Chad (Tchad)+235
    • Chile+56
    • China (中国)+86
    • Christmas Island+61
    • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
    • Colombia+57
    • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
    • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
    • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
    • Cook Islands+682
    • Costa Rica+506
    • Côte d’Ivoire+225
    • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
    • Cuba+53
    • Curaçao+599
    • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
    • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
    • Denmark (Danmark)+45
    • Djibouti+253
    • Dominica+1767
    • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
    • Ecuador+593
    • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
    • El Salvador+503
    • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
    • Eritrea+291
    • Estonia (Eesti)+372
    • Ethiopia+251
    • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
    • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
    • Fiji+679
    • Finland (Suomi)+358
    • France+33
    • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
    • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
    • Gabon+241
    • Gambia+220
    • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
    • Germany (Deutschland)+49
    • Ghana (Gaana)+233
    • Gibraltar+350
    • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
    • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
    • Grenada+1473
    • Guadeloupe+590
    • Guam+1671
    • Guatemala+502
    • Guernsey+44
    • Guinea (Guinée)+224
    • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
    • Guyana+592
    • Haiti+509
    • Honduras+504
    • Hong Kong (香港)+852
    • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
    • Iceland (Ísland)+354
    • India (भारत)+91
    • Indonesia+62
    • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
    • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
    • Ireland+353
    • Isle of Man+44
    • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
    • Italy (Italia)+39
    • Jamaica+1
    • Japan (日本)+81
    • Jersey+44
    • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
    • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
    • Kenya+254
    • Kiribati+686
    • Kosovo+383
    • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
    • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
    • Laos (ລາວ)+856
    • Latvia (Latvija)+371
    • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
    • Lesotho+266
    • Liberia+231
    • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
    • Liechtenstein+423
    • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
    • Luxembourg+352
    • Macau (澳門)+853
    • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
    • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
    • Malawi+265
    • Malaysia+60
    • Maldives+960
    • Mali+223
    • Malta+356
    • Marshall Islands+692
    • Martinique+596
    • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
    • Mauritius (Moris)+230
    • Mayotte+262
    • Mexico (México)+52
    • Micronesia+691
    • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
    • Monaco+377
    • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
    • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
    • Montserrat+1664
    • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
    • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
    • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
    • Namibia (Namibië)+264
    • Nauru+674
    • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
    • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
    • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
    • New Zealand+64
    • Nicaragua+505
    • Niger (Nijar)+227
    • Nigeria+234
    • Niue+683
    • Norfolk Island+672
    • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
    • Northern Mariana Islands+1670
    • Norway (Norge)+47
    • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
    • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
    • Palau+680
    • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
    • Panama (Panamá)+507
    • Papua New Guinea+675
    • Paraguay+595
    • Peru (Perú)+51
    • Philippines+63
    • Poland (Polska)+48
    • Portugal+351
    • Puerto Rico+1
    • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
    • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
    • Romania (România)+40
    • Russia (Россия)+7
    • Rwanda+250
    • Saint Barthélemy+590
    • Saint Helena+290
    • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1869
    • Saint Lucia+1758
    • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
    • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
    • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1784
    • Samoa+685
    • San Marino+378
    • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
    • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
    • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
    • Serbia (Србија)+381
    • Seychelles+248
    • Sierra Leone+232
    • Singapore+65
    • Sint Maarten+1721
    • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
    • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
    • Solomon Islands+677
    • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
    • South Africa+27
    • South Korea (대한민국)+82
    • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
    • Spain (España)+34
    • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
    • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
    • Suriname+597
    • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
    • Swaziland+268
    • Sweden (Sverige)+46
    • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
    • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
    • Taiwan (台灣)+886
    • Tajikistan+992
    • Tanzania+255
    • Thailand (ไทย)+66
    • Timor-Leste+670
    • Togo+228
    • Tokelau+690
    • Tonga+676
    • Trinidad and Tobago+1868
    • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
    • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
    • Turkmenistan+993
    • Turks and Caicos Islands+1649
    • Tuvalu+688
    • U.S. Virgin Islands+1340
    • Uganda+256
    • Ukraine (Україна)+380
    • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
    • United Kingdom+44
    • United States+1
    • Uruguay+598
    • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
    • Vanuatu+678
    • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
    • Venezuela+58
    • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
    • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
    • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
    • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
    • Zambia+260
    • Zimbabwe+263
    • Åland Islands+358

    We respect your right to data privacy and security. You may unsubscribe from our communications at any time. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.